watch one of the latest warnings on u tube... there are many on this subject.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfXqM3xz1A

prolly time to go to the mall and get that container at Casket City



definitely don't want no jb Blowin' in the Wind....



casket up jb

The hull of Titanic is rotted out in too many places. Enemies within, like parasites, and enemies pulling us down on every side, like hyennas on a weakened wildebeest. A wildebeest that doesn't have enough brain cells left to even protect itself.

The goal is in sight.


http://www.washingtontimes.com...ver-the-white-house/

Personally, I believe all "progressives" and crooked 'conservative' sellouts, should have to hear this blasted on loud speakers in their neighborhoods 5x a day starting before sunrise, for the rest of their lives! Poetic Justice. The Borg for the lot of them! Bwaaahahahaha!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...PakE&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAvlimEYEpQ

Tribulation Prep:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...KFTY&feature=related

An Arizona-style immigration measure passed the Senate 31-18 Tuesday evening despite the opposition of community leaders who say it will hurt Indiana's image and lead to racial profiling.

The wide-ranging bill would task state and local police with enforcing federal immigration law and require most government documents and hearings to be in English only.

Proponents said the bill would help protect Indiana from terrorists who might sneak in via the Mexican border, from competition from illegal immigrant laborers who might drive down wages, and from the tax burden of paying for the government services they use.

"This bill should not be called the Immigration Matters bill," said Sen. Michael Young, R-Indianapolis. "It should be called the Indiana Security and Taxpayer Protection Act."

Opponents of the bill include some of the state's largest employers such as Eli Lilly and Co. and Cummins Inc., as well as associations that represent cities and towns, hotels, restaurants and other businesses.

Some business leaders say they already are hearing from conventions, conferences and prospective employees who say they would avoid coming to Indiana for fear that visitors would be targeted by police based on their appearance.

The bill's author, Sen. Mike Delph, R-Carmel, was absent for the vote because he was taking the bar exam, the professional test to become a lawyer. He has said the bill merely enforces existing laws and does not encourage racial profiling, which he called "illegal, immoral and wrong."

Five Republican senators -- Beverly Gard, Greenfield; Sue Glick, LaGrange; Ed Charbonneau, Valparaiso; Jean Leising, Oldenburg; and Tom Wyss, Fort Wayne -- voted with Democrats against the measure.

Wyss, who has worked on homeland security issues, said the measure would invite lawsuits and questioned the merits of passing a bill to send a message to the federal government.

"If they don't know how we feel about illegal immigration and that it should be stopped," he said, "I don't know what we're going to do that would make much of a difference."

Sen. Lonnie Randolph, D-East Chicago, said he found it hard to believe the Senate was even considering the measure.

"It's polarizing," he said. "It's discriminatory. It's a federal issue. It's not a state issue."



it's always the same song and dance,, when a bill in the process of becomming law...racial profiling bs. americans are required to carry papers on themselves at all times when they are in another country. all non americans should carry papers on themselves while they are in this country the USA.
i had a headlight out,, i got stopped and asked for my dl, and registration, and insurance. the cop that stopped me was not white,, i took no offence to him stopping me, when i was almost home.

quote:

Reply

67% Say States Should Be Able To Enforce Immigration Laws If Feds Are Not
Friday, February 18, 2011 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement
In response to the Justice Department challenge of its effort to crack down on illegal immigration, Arizona has sued the federal government for failing to enforce immigration laws. Most voters continue to support Arizona’s new immigration law and strongly believe states should be able to fight illegal immigration if the federal government is not.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 67% of Likely U.S. Voters – two-out-of-three – think a state should have the right to enforce immigration laws if it believes the federal government is not enforcing them. Just 22% disagree and say states should not have that right. (To see survey question wording, click here).

Arizona is seeking reimbursement in its suit against the federal government, and nearly half (49%) believe the federal government should reimburse states for expenses incurred as a result of illegal immigration. Thirty percent (30%) say the government should not have to reimburse states, but another 21% are not sure.

Fifty-seven percent (57%) of voters continue to favor passage of an immigration law like Arizona’s in their own state. Twenty-eight percent (28%) oppose such a law, and 15% are undecided about it.

This is consistent with support for the law since its passage last spring, even after a federal judge put key provisions of it on hold in July as part of the Justice Department’s ongoing legal challenge.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Likely U.S. Voters was conducted on February 16-17, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Most voters continue to believe the policies of the federal government encourage illegal immigration, but voters are now almost evenly divided over whether it's better to let the federal government or individual states enforce immigration laws.

Eighty-seven percent (87%) of Republicans and 74% of voters not affiliated with either major party say states should have the right to enforce immigration laws if they believe the federal government is not. Democrats are almost evenly divided on the question.

Most Republicans also think the federal government should reimburse states for expenses due to illegal immigration, while Democrats and unaffiliated voters are more narrowly divided.

But 57% of unaffiliated voters support passage of a law like Arizona’s in their state, as do 77% of Republicans. A plurality (49%) of Democrats opposes passage of a law like that in their own state.

As is frequently the case, there’s a wide gap between the Political Class and Mainstream voters on these questions. Seventy-five percent (75%) of the Political Class oppose passage of an Arizona-like law in their home state, while 69% of Mainstream voters favor such a law.

Similarly, 84% of those in the Mainstream think states should have the right to enforce immigration laws if they believe the federal government is not enforcing them. But 69% of Political Class voters say states should not have that right.

Sixty-five percent (65%) of all Likely Voters say gaining control of the border is more important in terms of immigration legislation than legalizing the status of undocumented workers already living in the United States. This finding has remained largely unchanged for years.

Just 28% of voters supported the Justice Department challenge of Arizona’s law at the time it was announced in early July of last year.

Sixty-four percent (64%) of voters said last June that they believed the federal government by failing to enforce immigration law was more to blame for the controversy over Arizona’s new statute than state officials were for passing it.

Americans strongly believe that Mexico does not want to stop the tide of illegal immigration into the United States, and 58% think Mexico should be asked to compensate U.S. taxpayers to offset the costs related to this problem.

Republicans continue to hold a double-digit lead over Democrats when it comes to whom voters trust more on the issue of immigration.

Additional i

Home /News /Local /Mass.
Problems remain in flight school security
Few changes are evident following Stow arrests
‘The airport managers are obviously working more closely with TSA and ICE.’


By Maria Sacchetti
Globe Staff / February 21, 2011
federal officials arrested the immigrant owner of a Stow flight school and 33 of his students for being in the United States illegally, officials have not instituted new safeguards to prevent something similar from happening again.

Tweet 5 people Tweeted this..
Yahoo! Buzz ShareThis .No links to terrorism were found at TJ Aviation Flight Academy, but critics jarred by the episode nearly a decade after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks questioned how it was possible for an illegal immigrant to obtain a pilot’s license, open a flight school in Massachusetts, and teach other immigrants here illegally to fly small aircraft.

“It’s shocking how many vulnerabilities are still there, gaping open, this long after 9/11,’’ said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that favors tougher limits on immigration. “We clearly need to have more checkpoints and more due diligence along the way to make sure that this can’t happen.’’

US immigration officials arrested school owner Thiago DeJesus last July and, during the next several months, 33 students at the school, all from Brazil and many carrying expired visas, for being in the country illegally. DeJesus said the students had obtained clearance from the Transportation Security Administration to learn to fly single-engine planes at Minute Man Airfield, about 30 miles northwest of Boston.

The TSA, which is in charge of scrutinizing all foreign flight students before they can take flying lessons or get a pilot’s license in the United States, is working with federal immigration officials “to refine the process for checking the immigration status of alien flight school students,’’ said TSA spokesman Greg Soulé.

Soulé said the TSA fully vets foreign flight students using criminal, terrorism, and immigration databases when they apply for permission to take lessons, to ensure that they are not known or suspected threats to aviation. Flight schools are required to keep a copy of each visa for their records.

But the TSA does not always follow up to ensure that a student stops flying when his or her visa expires. And after the initial TSA check, students can go on to obtain a pilot’s license from the Federal Aviation Administration.

The FAA is also investigating what happened with the Stow flight school. But agency spokeswoman Laura J. Brown said her agency relies on the TSA for criminal and immigration background checks.

She said the FAA does not have the legal authority to revoke a pilot’s license for being in the country illegally.

DeJesus’s pilot’s license remained valid after his arrest last year. After he was released pending a hearing in Boston immigration court, he resumed teaching people how to fly. His school closed after a Globe article about the arrests was published in November.Continued...

In an interview last year, DeJesus told a Globe reporter that he was in the country legally. But his lawyer, Venessa Masterson, said he had overstayed his visa.

Tweet 5 people Tweeted this..
Yahoo! Buzz ShareThis .On Dec. 22, a Boston immigration judge gave DeJesus 60 days to leave the United States voluntarily, by the end of this month, instead of being deported, his lawyer said.

Of the 34 arrested from the Stow school last year, three have been allowed to return to Brazil voluntarily and two others were deported, said Chuck Jackson, spokesman for US Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which made the arrests. The rest are in removal proceedings, he said.

Vaughan suggested that several federal agencies should assume part of the responsibility for screening illegal immigrants from flight schools.

The FAA could check immigration status before issuing a pilot’s license, she said, and the TSA and ICE could ensure that immigrants aren’t continuing to fly airplanes after their visas expire.

“Everyone seems to be passing the buck,’’ she said.

Christopher Willenborg, administrator for the Massachusetts Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division, which oversees 36 public and private noncommercial airports in Massachusetts, said he has seen better coordination since the Globe article was published.

The TSA and ICE appear to be working together more, he said, and TSA agents are showing up more frequently at airports.

In addition, airport managers plan to meet soon with immigration officials, and the aeronautics division is updating its security directives at the airports.

“The airport managers are obviously working more closely with TSA and ICE,’’ he said. “They’ve increased their visits out to the airports. There’s an increased effort to coordinate better in regards to all parties involved.’’

Still, security varies by airport in Massachusetts.

At Massport’s Hanscom Field, all flight students and pilots must undergo a criminal background check and obtain a security badge, in addition to whatever the TSA requires, said spokesman Richard Walsh. If they are foreign nationals, Walsh said, their badge expires when their visa does.

He said the airport, among the busiest noncommercial airports in New England, instituted the requirements after Sept. 11, 2001, as an added layer of security.

“We do more than what is required because security is our first priority,’’ said Walsh.

But at Minute Man Air Field, which is a much smaller airport off a quiet country road in Stow, there are no such requirements. Airport owner Don McPherson said checking immigration issues is the federal government’s responsibility.

“I don’t think it’s up to the airports [to question immigration status]. It’s out of our jurisdiction,’’ he said. “Most airport managers have tenants that provide flight training, and it’s the tenant’s responsibility to follow those rules.’’

Eli Luria, who opened his own flight school, Tenle Aviation Inc., in the same location that TJ Aviation vacated in Stow, said he told a TSA agent that he would monitor the visas himself to ensure that none of his foreign students take lessons with expired visas.

“Basically I’ve made my own commitment to myself that when I do have an alien that wants to do training, that I’ll verify his visa on my own, even though it’s not a requirement,’’ said Luria, who was a part-time instructor at TJ Aviation.

He said his new business is separate from the former school.

How is it that the American government thinks it can both protect and bring stability to other countries when it is obviously beyond their capabilities to protect our southern border from intruders?

As far as Indiana goes...I'm not surprised. Everything I've seen and what I've heard from Indiana transplants that came here with GM, you don't have to be a brown illegal to be suspect. You just have to be non-white.

How about THIS idea?...Instead of charging Juan with driving down wages, why not go after the American business people that hire people without SS cards? People wouldn't be going through hell to get here if there wasn't an open market of jobs waiting. WE INVITED THEM!!

well lets just say they were invited... but you are right...it might be impossible to plug the dyke now. our government agencies are full of bi= lingual speaking people,, the government encouraged students to learn spanish,,, and in the mean time,, they hired just about anyone who spoke spanish. thus we also have illegal government employees. who,, for a price,, will get illegals approved for various free bees,, medicaid,,food stamps,, housing,, education, child care, ect. so if a mexican dhs worker interviews another mexican,, and that person is illegal,, they will get approved for everything thats available. i don't have the stats,, but i'll bet,, if a person was to check into this therory , they would find that ,, there are more illegals in certain states and more in certain counties... and you will find,, more mexican or people of mexican decent,, making the decisions, concerning those free bees. have you ever heard a mexican complain because they were turned down for assistance ????

Be glad we aren't facing with Italy is facing now...of course anyone wanna bet on how many will make it over here on the taxpayer's dime?

http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie...html_1583848537.html

I would like to see the immigration process streamlined so people, like Mexicans, can come here AFTER being checked out like my immigrant grandparents were, get a social security number, work, raise families and pay income, medicare and social security taxes like the rest of us.

Please do not misunderstand my last post as a by on illegal people invading our country and getting free services on our dime. I'm just saying that we can't expect border jumpers to stop if we continue to leave the borders wide open and unprotected just because certain constituents save money on the cheaper labor.

I used to work in the concrete business. I know how many contractors hire under the table and how many of those hirees send their tax free money back home. I also know that everything brown coming across he border doesn't HAVE to be Hispanic. That worries me more than labor rates any day! This mess was created by government people looking the other way. It can be fixed by government people actually doing their job instead of just composing spin.

how about this,, i always thought that if a illegal or legal mexican got a education in the US,, that they should at least go back to their country and use the education they got here in the USA.. probably for free.now i know how at least one is using their education,, i'll bet there are others who hold high government jobs....kinda makes sense when you wonder how all these mexicans get into this country under the radar.

---------------------------------------------

Utah Senator Robles holds simultaneous Utah and Mexican Government Offices
February 23rd, 2011 12:48 am MT .
Often referred to as a "political newcomer", Utah Democratic Senator Luz Robles (UT-1) is described by legislative intern Drew Martinez as "an immigrant from Mexico" who "came here in 1996 to attend the University of Utah, where she earned a bachelor's degree in business marketing and a master's in public administration..." Martinez's January 15, 2009 blog post continues to detail an impressive list of local affilations and boards served on by Senator Robles. The blog also concludes "[S]he [Robles] really is an exceptional public servant. She's not your typical Utah legislator. She's first off a woman. Also she is a minority in both race and political party..." Mr. Martinez leaves out some other facts that by all accounts, were also unknown by voters during the election that pushed Senator Robles in the political arena. Indeed, Senator Robles is not a political newcomer at all. In fact the Senator is a seasoned veteran, having previously held elected as well as appointed offices, in the Mexican government.

It is important to note that Senator Robles is a naturalized United States citizen and part of that process entails taking an oath of allegance to the United States, the text of which is:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." source

A chronology of Senator Robles' relevant political affiliations and career in the United States is:

Senator Robles was appointed as the interim Director of the Utah Office of Ethnic Affairs from July, 2005 to November, 2005;
Senator Robles was appointed as the Director of the Utah Office of Ethnic Affairs in November, 2005 where she served until September, 2007, when she resigned to accept a position with Zion's Bank;
2008 Senator Robles becomes the Democratic candidate for Utah Senate District 1 and participates in the conventions and process in the Spring;
November 4, 2008 Senator Robles is elected to the Utah State Senate;
January, 2009 Senator Robles is sworn into office; and,
February 6, 2009 Senator Robles' "Conflict of Interest and Renumeration" statement is received by the Utah Secretary of State and lists only Zions Bank as a potential conflict;
What has not previously been reported or disclosed is the following chronology of Senator Robles' political career with the Mexican government:

In September, 2005 Ms. Robles was elected through an electoral process conducted by the Consulate of Mexico to a three year term in the "Consejo Consultivo Del Instituto De Los Mexicanos En El Exterior" (CCIME). The CCIME was an advisory commission created by Mexican President Vincente Fox and placed in within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Mexican Government. source;
Ms. Robles held her elected position from 2006 through 2008;
During her tenure with the CCIME, Ms. Robles attended at least seven (7) conferences and served as the Coordinator for CCIME the Legal Affairs Commission for three (3) conferences and as a member on the Political Affairs Commission for three (3) conferences; source
Ms. Robles attended her 6th conference after having won election to the Utah Senate and her 7th as an observer after being sworn into the Senate in Utah;
Three of the conferences attened by Ms. Robles were held at the Presidential Residence in Mexico;
During the November, 2007 CCIME conference, Ms. Robles was the featured speaker. speech
At the November 10-11, 2008 CCIME conference, Ms. Robles was the moderator for the "Estados Emergentes" meeting, which was also attended by MALDEF (The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund). link
A review of the CCIME website and documents is replete with references to Senator Robles attending and participating in meetings, policy decisions and other official functions both while she was the Director of the Utah Office of Ethnic Affairs and after she had won election to the Utah Senate. link

This is a case where the existence of impropriety cries out for an investigation by the Utah Senate Ethics Committee and possibly the Utah Attorney General. The next time Senator Robles takes the floor of the Senate to debate SB 60, Utahans will have to ask, "exactly which constituents is Senator Robles speaking for, Utahans or those in the CCIME?

..

E-Mail News Alerts
Get breaking news and daily headlines.

Browse all e-mail newsletters
Related To Story






Illegal Alien Pleads Guilty To Food Stamp Fraud
Man Accused Of Taking $1.6 Million

POSTED: 3:28 pm EST February 26, 2011
UPDATED: 10:22 pm EST February 26, 2011

facebookdel.icio.usbuzzdiggreddit›› Email›› PrintAn illegal immigrant from the Dominican Republic has pleaded guilty to allegations that he used straw owners to operate several grocery stores in Hartford that he used to defraud the federal food stamp program of about $1.6 million. Federal prosecutors say Apolinare Collado, who also used numerous aliases, allowed customers to exchange food stamps for cash and other products not eligible for purchase with the benefit between 2003 and 2009. The 43-year-old pleaded guilty Friday to one count of food stamp fraud. He faces up to 20 years in prison at sentencing scheduled for June 6. In 1998, Collado was previously sentenced to 18 months in prison and was later deported after he was convicted of food stamp fraud, tax fraud and immigration offenses. He had been detained since January 2009 for immigration violations.

quote:

Posted February 26, 2011 06:09 AM Hide Post
how about this,, i always thought that if a illegal or legal mexican got a education in the US,, that they should at least go back to their country and use the education they got here in the USA.. probably for free.now i know how at least one is using their education,, i'll bet there are others who hold high government jobs....kinda makes sense when you wonder how all these mexicans get into this country under the radar.

probably for free====how dare u continually degrade Hispanics!

White collar crime by white skinned Americans is tenfold the problem illegal immigrant crime is.
And who built the system with loopholes that a 'MEXICAN' can figure out anyway. Just using your words make me feel dirty.

then take a bath ruperv !!